|
504.01
Experience is always special case.
|
|
504.011
Events: Energy events and structures are always special
case (see Sec.
1075).
|
|
504.02
The human brain apprehends and stores each sense-reported
bit of
information regarding each special-case experience.
Only special-case experiences are
recallable from the memory bank.
|
|
504.03
There is in Universe a vast order. It never forsakes.
I throw a coin in the air,
and it returns and hits the floor every time. Nature
is never at a loss about what to do
about anything. Nature never vacillates in her decisions.
The rolling oceans cover three-
quarters of Earth. Along the beaches, the surf is continually
pounding on the shore. No
two successive local surf poundings have ever been the
same nor will they ever be the
same. They typify the infinitude of individualism of
every special-case event in the
Universe.
|
|
504.04
Weightless, abstract human mind reviews and from time
to time discovers
mathematically reliable and abstractly statable interrelationships
existing between and
amongst, but not "in" or "of," any of the special-case
experience components of the
relationship. When a long-term record of testing proves
the relationship to persist without
exception, it is rated as a scientifically generalized
principle. Whenever human mind
discovers a generalized principle to exist amongst the
special-case experience sets, the
discovery event itself becomes a new special-case experience
to be stored in the brain bank
and recalled when appropriate. Amongst a plurality of
brain-stored, newly understood
experiences, mind has, from time to time, discovered
greater and more significant
understandings, which in their turn as discoveries,
which are "experiences," constitute
further very special-case experiences to be stored in
the recallable and reconsiderable brain
bank's wealth of special-case experiences.
|
|
504.10
Truth as Special Case Realizations
|
|
504.11
We may say that thinking about the truth alters truth,
but only to the extent
of defining it. We may always clarify and redefine the
truth by making it more
comprehensively considerate and more incisively exquisite.
Truth alters truth only by
refining the definition. The substance of the sensing
and instrumental control of the
physical means of communication is always refinable
and tends toward the
ephemeralization of doing ever more with ever less,
but you can never get to the exact,
most economical statement of the truth, for the very
communication will have
ephemeralized to pure metaphysics. Truths are like generalized
principles:
interaccommodative and nonintercontradictory. Truths
are special case realizations of the
generalized principles; by these very aspects are they
discovered to be truths.
|
|
504.12
The experience of life inevitably brings inspirational
glimpsing of the cosmic
orderly vectors, all of which point convergingly to
the absolute. The synergetic integral of
all truths__being absolute__is incomprehensible to temporality.
|
|
504.13
Truth is special case. Truths tend to articulate generalized
principles. All the
cosmic generalized principles are omniembracing. Truth,
like gravity, is nonlinear; it is
omniembracing. Of all the creatures on our planet only
humans have demonstrated the
ability to discover progressive truths.
|
|
504.14
As humans are physically situate halfway between the
largest and smallest
known bio-organisms, they are also halfway between the
astro-largest and nuclear-smallest
physical phenomena; humans thus find themselves between
an absolute, omnidirectional,
equilibrious, dimensionless, metaphysical core contained
within a spheric twilight zone of
macro-almost-true and themselves containing a spheric
twilight zone of micro-almost-true.
As humans are in the middle of the cosmic scheme metaphysically,
truth itself is an
unreachable, omnidirectional, cosmic center. The truth
is zero eternal.
Temporality=tempo-reality=time-reality. In temporality
you cannot reach the truth. You
cannot be exact because truth is zero. Absolute truth
is an omnizerophase condition. The
metaphysical comprehension passes through, expandingly
and contractively, but fails ever
to remain at the zero core of equilibrious truth.
|
|
504.15
As we reduce the tolerance for error, we begin to
get near the eternal, which
is what we call the truth. But we will never quite get
there. The inexhaustibly attractive
and truthfully inspired thoughts of human minds ever
approach an evolutionary refinement
while constantly intertransforming as a precessional
consequence of progressively
experienced complexes of omniinteraccommodative, intercomplementary
transactional
events; the process results in ever-closer proximity
to perfect equilibrium of all
intertransformative forces, but it never attains such
equilibrium.
|
|
504.16
Truth may be dealt with only as relative relationships
of interactions of
dynamic principles. Degrees of accuracy are refinements
that in no way affect the
fundamental reliability of the directional or angular
sense toward centralized truths. Truth
is a relationship; it is a direction rather than an
attainment. The search for truth is a
yielding to the integrity of the intellect, revealing
information and nuances that are ever
more impressive, more delicate, and more exciting.
|
|
504.17
Truth is the progressive diminution of residual error.
The generalizations are
eternal. The more accurately we state the truth, the
less frequently it becomes necessary to
modify our statement of it. We have to change what we
say less and less. Eventually it
works back to the eternality of No Change.
|
505.00
Pattern
|
505.01
When we speak of pattern integrities, we refer to
generalized patterns of
conceptuality gleaned sensorially from a plurality of
special-case pattern experiences that
have been proven experimentally to be existent always,
without exception, in every special
case within the required class of experiences.
|
|
505.02
Special-case events may appear to be both continuous
and "linear" __but
only as locally and momentarily experienced. For all
experimental observations of at first
seemingly "continuous" and "straight-line" experiences
(subjective) or of experimental
experiences (objective), when projected or prolonged,
are always discovered to have been
short increments of larger multidirectionally peregrinating,
curvilinear, wave actions of
discontinuous events (stars) in Milky Way__like, stepping-stone,
"linear" arrays.
|
|
505.03
All experiences are omnidirectionally oriented. Omnidirectional
experiences
resolve themselves scientifically into discrete angle
and frequency patterns. That is life!
Relationships are local to pattern. Patterns are comprehensive
to relationships.
|
|
505.04
In a comprehensive view of nature, the physical world
is seen as a patterning
of patternings whose constituent functions are fields
of force, each of which
compenetrates and influences other localized fields
of force.
|
|
505.05
Action and interaction of events are accompanied by
relative omnidirectional
displacements and accommodations of other events. In
considering a total inventory of the
relative abundance of different patterns, it becomes
apparent that patterns are reciprocal.
|
|
505.06
The artist frequently conceives of a unique pattern
in his imagination before
the scientist finds it objectively in nature.
|
|
505.10
Euler: Minimum Aspects of Pattern
|
|
505.101
Euler said that we are dealing in pattern. Mathematics
is pattern, and there
are irreducible aspects of pattern. That is, the patterns
represent events. A line is a unique
kind of pattern. If I have two lines, where the two
lines cross is distinctly different from
where the two lines do not cross. Euler called this
the vertex, the convergence. He saw
this as absolute pattern uniqueness.
(See Sec. 523.)
|
|
505.11
Euler showed that all optical experiences that we
can pattern or form are
composed exclusively of three patterning elements: lines,
vertexes, and areas__or
trajectories, crossings, and openings, as they are known
in synergetics. These
incontrovertible minimum aspects of pattern are all
that is necessary to analyze and
inventory all parts of all optically apprehended patterns
as well as of all whole patterns.
And Euler disclosed three algebraic formulae characterizing
the constant relative-
abundance relationships of these three fundamental topological
elements in all patterns.
|
|
505.12
All happening patterns consist of experience recalls.
The recallable
ingredients of experiences consist inherently of paired-event
quanta of six-vectored
positive and negative actions, reactions, and resultants.
|
|
505.20
Pattern Integrity
|
|
505.201
A pattern has an integrity independent of the medium
by virtue of which you
have received the information that it exists. Each of
the chemical elements is a pattern
integrity. Each individual is a pattern integrity. The
pattern integrity of the human
individual is evolutionary and not static.
|
|
505.21
Each of the chemical elements is a uniquely complex
pattern of energy event
interrelatednesses which interact inter-interferingly
to continually relocalize the involved
quantity of energy. These self-interference patterns
of atomic element components are in
many ways similar to the family of knots that are tied
with rope by sailors to produce
various local behaviors, all of which, however, result
in further contraction of the knot as
the two ends of the rope immediately outside the knot
are pulled away from one another
by forces external to the knot__and thus all the attractive
forces of Universe operating
upon the atoms may result precessionally in keeping
the atomic knots pulled together.
(See Sec.506.14.)
|
|
505.30
Waves
|
|
505.301
When we drop a stone into water, we see a wave emanate
outwardly in a
plane. We agree that it is not water but that we are
seeing a wave in pure principle. It is
not simultaneous: therefore to conceptualize we are
using our memory and afterimage. We
can never have static waves; they have nothing to do
with statics. We see a wave
operative in time and in pure principle. If we initiate
wave-propagating energy action at
one point, a complete omnidirectional wave develops.
|
|
505.31
When a stone is dropped into a tank of water, the
stone does not penetrate
the water molecules. The molecules are jostled; they
"accommodate" the stone and in the
process jostle their neighboring molecules, which, in
turn, jostle their own outwardly
surrounding water molecule neighbors. Thus waves of
relayed jostling are propagated.
Each relayed wave, although a composite of locally forwarded
actions, provides a
synergetic continuity scenario of those actions. The
consequence is a pattern of events that
has an integrity of its own, independent of the local
displacement accommodations (which
are innocent with respect to the overall synergetic
pattern).
|
|
505.32
The same stone dropped successively in pools of water,
milk, or gasoline
will generate the same wave patterns. Yet the waves
are essences neither of milk nor of
water nor of gasoline. The waves are distinct and measurable
pattern integrities in their
own right, visibly growing and traveling outwardly as
each locally involved molecule of
the liquids develops a narrow vertical ellipse circuitry
returning to where it started, unless
a powerful wind operating parallel to and above the
liquid blows the top molecules free as
bubbles to tumble down the wave side like water on a
hillside. (See Sec. 1005.14.)
|
|
505.33
Individuals regenerate their own sound and air displacement
waves and
ripples in the physical environment just as stones create
waves and ripples in the different
liquids into which they are thrown. They also propagate
metaphysical wave patterns that
develop local pattern displacements in the human affairs
cosmos. They also propagate
both conscious and unconscious electromagnetic waves.
The wave is as abstract as the
concept of an angle. Waves are weightless patterns.
|
|
505.34
The room we sit in is permeated by thousands of weightless
waves, each of
unique character. You can tune in hundreds of wide-frequency-range
radios within your
room, and each can bring in a different program from
a different part of the world because
the individual, weightless waves flow through trees
and house walls. That extraordinary
world of weightless, invisible waves is governed by
mathematical laws, not by the opinions
of men. The magnificent orderliness of that ever individually
and uniquely patterning
weightless wave Universe is not of man's contriving.
The infinite variety of evolutionary
complexities, inherent to the orderliness of complementary
principles operative in
Universe, is of unending synergetic uniqueness.
|
|
505.40
Wave or Particle
|
![]() Fig. 505.41 |
505.41
One of the things we have to make clear for society
is the intellectual
dilemma of the Max Planck-descended scientists: the
way they do their problems, they can
have either a wave or a particle but not both simultaneously.
Heisenberg has the same
dilemma. They make the error of thinking of a wave as
a physical continuity rather than as
a metaphysical, weightless pattern integrity, experimentally
detectable only by virtue of the
medium of the locally displaced, frequency tuned, physical
phenomenon__a principle
operating utterly independent of any physical medium.
(See Secs. 973.30
and 1009.36.)
|
505.50
Abstract vs Energetic
[505.50-505.83 Pattern Scenario]
|
505.51
The science of pattern is mathematical. As the fundamental
communications
system of all the sciences mathematics is both the most
comprehensive and the most
abstract of the sciences. Experimentally discovered
mathematical relationships permit
generalized statements of such laws as are found to
be governing all science, and all
sciences must use mathematics. Nonexperimentally disclosed
mathematical relationships
can be imaginatively evolved, however, but they may
or may not have identity with
physical Universe behavior. It is for instance mathematically
feasible to explore a
hypothetical Universe theoretically devoid of any one
of the family of mathematical
operations, such as, for instance, a Universe in which
there is only multiplication and no
division, or an exclusively two-dimensional Universe.
|
|
505.52
Employing only mathematics in the analysis of physically
verifiable data
(which always includes all the known physically relevant
variables) can provide
information to humans within minutes regarding cosmic
events that in themselves take
years to transpire, even though they occur at the speed
of light.
|
|
505.53
Synergetics conceptualizes in generalized principles,
in contradistinction to
special-case empirics. We may logically hypothesize
either (a) that mathematics is entirely
physical, or (b) that the physical is in reality pure
abstract principle. You can play the game
either way: both are valid, but not simultaneously.
There are certainly not two absolutely
separate and independently operating Universes: the
abstract Universe of the
mathematician and the energetic Universe of the physiochemist.
|
|
505.60
Minimum-Limit Case
|
|
505.61
You cannot have a line that is less than a line, or
a fix that is less than a fix,
or a virgin that is less than a virgin. Nature comes
to minimum-limit case with all her
points in order to feel very comfortable. But the resolution
is not linear or planar: it is
omnidirectional; it is hierarchical in ascending or
descending hierarchies.
|
|
505.62
You grow or decrease. You get better or worse. In
parallelism things do not
converge. Science is not getting the right answers because
scientists do not think
divergently and convergently. If you are in parallel,
you can never get to any conclusion
whatsoever. Waves require hierarchies.
(See Sec.260.20.)
|
|
505.63
Only means are parallel: means are the averages of
the limits. Dealing in
probability calculus scientists can deal only with averages
of limits; wherefore they explore
and speculate only in terms of parallels. Min-max limits
are inherently omnidirectional-
inherently divergently expansive toward max-limits and
convergently contractive toward
min-limits. There are no experimentally demonstrable,
absolute-maximum limits. Only the
minimum limit is demonstrably absolute__even when it
looks like a point.
|
|
505.64
All the characteristics of a system are absolute because
each of its
components is the minimum-limit case of its conceptual
category, for all conceptuality-as
Euler discovered and proved-consists at minimum of points,
areas, and lines.
|
|
505.65
An area is a nothingness. A plurality of areas are
views of nothingness
through separate frames. A point is a somethingness.
A line is a relationship between two
somethingnesses. An enlarged, apparently single somethingness
may prove to be
resolvable into a plurality of somethingnesses between
which the lines of interrelationship
fence off the nothingness into a plurality of separately
viewable nothingnesses. Points are
unresolvable, untunable somethingnesses occurring in
the twilight zone between visible
and supravisible experience.
(See Secs. 262.02
and 264.01)
|
|
505.70
Topology of Minimum Awareness
|
|
505.71
Awareness seems to be the one minimal word best expressing
the experience
of life. Awareness is inherently plural, for it consists
of the individual system that becomes
aware and the first minimum otherness of which it is
aware: such otherness may be
integrally internal or externally separate of the observing
system. We say, "No otherness:
no awareness"
(Sec. 905.02).
A philosopher may question
that statement, saying, "No,
you are wrong because awareness can be exclusively of
self." But we reply by
recapitulating the inherent minimum topology of awareness:
__ minimum self and minimum otherness are both systems,
each having both
insideness and outsideness;
|
|
505.72
Ergo, the minimum cognition employs the information-sensing,
remembering, and recognizing circuitry of the organic
substance's minimum self-sensing
awareness, which could only be at a minimum one as a
system of four minimum-event
components, being aware of its own integral system's
otherness-defining components.
Ergo, experientially, no otherness: no awareness. Q.E.D.
|
|
505.73
All minimum otherness or all minimum-observer self
are both plural unity
with mutual interawareness. Interawareness means one
system aware of another system or
the outsideness of a system aware of its system's insideness.
|
|
505.74
The observer and the observed constitute two points
differentiated against an
area of nothingness with an inherent interrelationship
line of awareness running between
the two points.
(See Sec. 264.01.)
Thus there is a minimum
set of four awareness aspects
of life:
|
|
505.80
Background Nothingness
|
|
505.81
When we draw a spherical triangle on the Earth's surface
(Fig. 812.03), it
demonstrates an aspect of geometry apparently not recognized
by Euler. The spherical
triangle also demonstrates self and otherness. The spherical
triangle is the first awareness:
there is an inherent twoness in the triangle's insideness
and outsideness; and the axis of the
two poles constitutes the two points of self and otherness.
The background nothingness of
these two points represents an area not contained by
a line. Euler apparently did not
realize that there could be an area not contained by
a line.
|
|
505.82
From Euler we know that the number of locally identified
minimum entities
called points plus the number of separate areas equals
the number of lines plus the number
two. In minimum awareness we have two identified entities
which, being local points,
must have directional fixedness against a background
of nothingness. Ergo, in minimum
awareness two points plus one area of nothingness have
one inherent line of most
economical interrelationship between the two points.
These two points plus one area equal
the number of lines-in this case "one" plus Euler's
abstractly accommodative two. (The
line of interrelationship is another aspect of the prime
vector. See Sec. 540.10.)
|
|
505.83
The Euler "plus one" abstractly accommodates two in
the minimum
awareness model:
|
| Next Section: 506.00 |