|
986.770
Shell Growth Rate Predicts Proton and Neutron Population
of the Elements
|
|
986.772
If we look at Fig.
222.01
(Synergetics 1), which shows
the three successive
layers of closest-packed spheres around the prime nuclear
sphere, we find the successive
layer counts to be 12, 42, 92 . . . that is, they are
"frequency to the second power times 10
plus 2." While we have been aware for 40 years that
the outermost layer of these
concentric layers is 92, and that its first three layers
add to
|
|
986.773
Recently, however, a scientist who had been studying
synergetics and
attending my lectures called my attention to the fact
that the first closest-packed layer 12
around the nuclear sphere and the second embracing closest-packed
layer of 42 follow the
same neutron count, combining with the outer layer number
of protons__as in the 92
uranium-layer case__to provide a physically conceptual
model of magnesium and
molybdenum. (See Table
419.21.)
|
|
986.800
Behavioral Proclivities of Spheric Experience
|
|
986.810
Discard of Abstract Dimensions
|
|
986.813
Because they cannot qualify as laws if any exceptions
to them are found, the
generalizable laws of Universe are inherently eternal-timeless-sizeless.
Sizing requires
time. Time is a cosmically designed consequence of humanity's
having been endowed with
innate slowness of apprehension and comprehension, which
lags induce time-lapse-altered
concepts. (Compare Sec.
529.09.)
|
![]() Fig. 986.816 |
986.816
In conventional geometry the linear characteristics
and the relative sizes of
lines dominate the conceptioning and its nomenclature-as,
for instance, using the term
"equiangular" triangle because only lengths or sizes
of lines vary in time. Lines are
unlimited in size and can be infinitely extended, whereas
angles are discrete fractions of a
discrete whole circle. Angles are angles independently
of the lengths of their edges. (See
Sec.
515.10.)
Lengths are always special time-size cases:
angles are eternally
generalized.... We can say with scientific accuracy:
"identical equiangular triangles." (See
Fig.
986.816.)
|
|
986.819
Synergetics procedure is always from a given whole
to the particular
fractional angles of the whole system considered. Synergetics
employs multiplication only
by division.... only by division of finite but non-unitarily-conceptual
Scenario Universe,
subdivided into initially whole primitive systems that
divide whole Universe into all the
Universe outside the system, all the Universe inside
the system, and the little bit of
Universe that provides the relevant set of special case
stars of experience that
illuminatingly define the vertexes of the considered
primitive generalized system of
consideration. (See Sec.
509.) Conventional geometry
"abstracts" by employment of
nonexistent__ergo,
nondemonstrable__parts, and it compounds
a plurality of those
nonexistents to arrive at supposedly real objects.
|
|
986.821
Synergetics identifies all of its primitive hierarchy
and their holistic
subdivisions only by their timeless-sizeless relative
angular fractional subdivisions of six
equiangular triangles surrounding a point, which hexagonal
array equals 360 degrees, if
we assume that the three angles of the equiangular triangle
always add up to 180 degrees.
Synergetics conducts all of its calculations by spherical
trigonometry and deals always
with the central and surface angles of the primitive
hierarchy of pre-time-size relationships
of the symmetrically concentric systems around any nucleus
of Universe__and their seven
great-circle symmetries of the 25 and 31 great-circle
systems (Sec.
1040). The foldability
of the four great-circle planes demonstrates the four
sets of hexagons omnisurrounding the
cosmic nucleus in omni-60-degree angular symmetry. This
we call the VE. (See Sec.
840.)
Angular identities may be operationally assumed to be
identical: There is only one
equiangular triangle, all of its angles being 60 degrees.
The 60-ness comes from the 60
positive and 60 negative, maximum number of surface
triangles or T Quanta Modules per
cosmic system into which convergent-divergent nuclear
unity may be subdivided. The
triangle, as physically demonstrated by the tube necklace
polygons (Sec.
608), is the only
self-stabilizing structure, and the equiangular triangle
is the most stable of all triangular
structures. Equiangular triangles may be calculatingly
employed on an "identical" basis.
|
|
986.830
Unrealizability of Primitive Sphere
|
|
986.831
As is shown elsewhere (Sec.
1022.11), synergetics finds
that the abstract
Greek "sphere" does not exist; nor does the quasisphere__the
sense-reported "spheric"
experiencings of humans__exist at the primitive stage
in company with the initial cosmic
hierarchy of timeless-sizeless symmetric polyhedra as
defined by the six positive and six
negative cosmic degrees of freedom and their potential
force vectors for adequately
coping with all the conditions essential to maintain
the individual integrity of min-max
primitive, structural, presubdivision systems of Universe.
|
|
986.833
The volume of a static quasisphere of unit vector length
(radius = l) is 4.188.
Each quasisphere is subexistent because it is not as
yet spun and there is as yet no time in
which to spin it. Seeking to determine anticipatorily
the volumetric value of the as-yet-
only-potential sphere's as-yet-to-be-spun domain (as
recounted in Secs.
986.206-214), I
converted my synergetics constant 1.0198255 to its ninth
power, as already recounted and
as intuitively motivated to accommodate the energetic
factors involved, which gave me the
number 1.192 (see Sec.
982.55), and with this ninth-powered
constant multiplied the
incipient sphere's already-third-powered volume of 4.188,
which produced the twelfth-
powered value 4.99206, which seems to tell us that synergetics'
experimentally
evidenceable only-by-high-frequency-spinning polyhedral
sphere has an unattainable but
ever-more-closely-approached limit tetravolume-5.000
(alpha) with however a physically
imperceptible 0.007904 volumetric shortfall of tetravolume-5,
the limit 4.99206 being the
maximum attainable twelfth-powered dynamism__being a
sphericity far more perfect than
that of any of the planets or fruits or any other of
nature's myriads of quasispheres, which
shortfallers are the rule and not the exceptions. The
primitively nonconceptual, only-
incipient sphere's only-potentially-to-be-demonstrated
domain, like the square root of
minus one, is therefore a useful, approximate-magnitude,
estimating tool, but it is not
structurally demonstrable. The difference in magnitude
is close to that of the T and E
Quanta Modules.
|
|
986.834
Since structure means an interself-stabilized complex-of-events
patterning
(Sec.
600.01),
the "spheric" phenomenon is conceptually__sensorially__experienceable
only as a time-size high-frequency recurrence of events,
an only-by-dynamic sweepout
domain, whose complex of involved factors is describable
only at the twelfth-power stage.
Being nonstructural and involving a greater volumetric
sweepout domain than that of their
unrevolved structural polyhedral domains, all quasispheres
are compressible.
|
|
986.840
Primitive Hierarchy as Physical and Metaphysical
|
|
986.850
Powerings as Systemic-integrity Factors
|
|
986.857
Not including the
|
|
986.860
Rhombic Dodecahedron 6 Minus Polyhedron 5 Equals Unity
|
|
986.861
High-frequency, triangulated unit-radius-vertexed,
geodesically interchorded,
spherical polyhedral apparencies are also structural
developments in time-size. There are
therefore two kinds of spherics: the highfrequency-event-stabilized,
geodesic, structural
polyhedron and the dynamically spun, only superficially
"apparent" spheres. The static,
structural, multifaceted, polyhedral, geodesic sphere's
vertexes are uniformly radiused
only by the generalized vector, whereas the only superficially
spun and only apparently
profiled spheres have a plurality of vertexial distances
outward from their systemic center,
some of which distances are greater than unit vector
radius while some of the vertexes are
at less than unit vector radius distance. (See Fig.
986.861.)
|
|
986.862
Among the symmetrical polyhedra having a tetravolume
of 5 and also having
radii a little more or a little less than that of unit
vector radius, are the icosahedron and the
enenicontahedron whose mean radii of spherical profiling
are less than four percent
vector-aberrant. There is, however, one symmetrical
primitive polyhedron with two sets of
its vertexes at greater than unit radius distance outwardly
from their system's nucleic
center; that is the rhombic dodecahedron, having, however,
a tetravolume of 6. The
rhombic dodecahedron's tetravolume of 6 may account
for the minimum intersystemness
in pure principle, being the space between omni-closest-packed
unit-radius spheres and the
spheres themselves. And then there is one symmetric
primitive polyhedron having a
volume of exactly tetravolume 5 and an interpattern
radius of 0.9995 of one unit vector;
this is the T Quanta Module phase rhombic triacontahedron.
There is also an additional
rhombic triacontahedron of exact vector radius and a
tetravolume of 5.007758031, which
is just too much encroachment upon the rhombic dodecahedron
6 minus the
triacontahedron 5 6 - 5 = 1,
or one volumetric unit
of unassigned cosmic "fail-safe
space": BANG__radiation-entropy and eventual turnaround
precessional fallin to
syntropic photosynthetic transformation into one of
matter's four states: plasmic, gaseous,
liquid, crystalline.
|
|
986.863
All the hierarchy of primitive polyhedra were developed
by progressive
great-circle-spun hemispherical halvings of halvings
and trisectings of halvings and
quintasectings (see Sec.
100.1041) of halvings of the
initial primitive tetrahedron itself.
That the rhombic triacontahedron of contact-facet radius
of unit vector length had a
trigonometrically calculated volume of 4.998 proved
in due course not to be a residual
error but the "critical difference" between matter and
radiation. This gives us delight in the
truth whatever it may be, recalling that all the discoveries
of this chronicle chapter were
consequent only to just such faith in the truth, no
matter how initially disturbing to
misinformed and misconditioned reflexes it may be.
|
|
986.870
Nuclear and Nonnuclear Module Orientations
|
|
986.871
The rhombic triacontahedron may be fashioned of 120
trivalently bonded T
Quanta Module tetrahedra, or of either 60 bivalently
interbonded positive T Modules or of
60 bivalently interbonded negative T Modules. In the
rhombic triacontahedron we have
only radiantly arrayed basic energy modules, arrayed
around a single spheric nuclear-
inadequate volumetric domain with their acute "corners"
pointed inwardly toward the
system's volumetric center, and their centers of mass
arrayed outwardly of the
system__ergo, prone to escape from the system.
|
|
986.872
In the tetrahedron constructed exclusively of 24 A
Modules, and in the
octahedron constructed of 48 A and 48 B Modules, the
asymmetric tetrahedral modules
are in radical groups, with their acute points arrayed
outwardly of the system and their
centers of mass arrayed inwardly of the system__ergo,
prone to maintain their critical
mass interattractive integrity. The outer sharp points
of the A and B Modules are located
at the centers of the four or six corner spheres defining
the tetrahedron and octahedron,
respectively. The fact that the tetrahedron's and octahedron's
A and B Modules have their
massive centers of volume pointing inwardly of the system
all jointly interarrayed in the
concentric layers of the VE, whereas in the rhombic
triacontahedron (and even more so in
the half-Couplers of the rhombic dodecahedron) we have
the opposite condition__which
facts powerfully suggest that the triacontahedron, like
its congruent icosahedron's
nonnuclear closest-possible-packed omniarray, presents
the exclusively radiational aspect
of a "one" or of a "no" nuclear-sphere-centered and
isolated most "spheric" polyhedral
system to be uniquely identified with the nonnuclear
bubble, the one-molecule-deep,
kinetically-escape-prone, gas-molecules-containing bubble.
|
|
986.8721
In the case of the rhombic dodecahedra we find that
the centers of volume of
their half-Couplers' A and B Modules occur almost congruently
with their respective
closest-packed, unit-radius sphere's outward ends and
thereby concentrate their energies
at several spherical-radius levels in respect to a common
nuclear-volume-adequate
center__all of which suggests some significant relationship
of this condition with the
various spherical-radius levels of the electron "shells."
|
|
986.873
The tetrahedron and octahedron present the "gravitational"
model of self-
and-otherness interattractive systems which inherently
provide witnessable evidence of the
systems' combined massive considerations or constellations
of their interbindings.
|
|
986.874
The highly varied alternate A and B Module groupings
permitted within the
same primitive rhombic dodecahedron, vector equilibrium,
and in the Couplers, permit us
to consider a wide spectrum of complexedly reorientable
potentials and realizations of
intermodular behavioral proclivities Lying in proximity
to one another between the
extreme radiational or gravitational proclivities, and
all the reorientabilities operative
within the same superficially observed space (Sec.
954).
All these large numbers of
potential alternatives of behavioral proclivities may
be circumferentially, embracingly
arrayed entirely within the same superficially observed
isotropic field.
|
| Next Section: 987.00 |